United States | To rent or not to rent

How landlords thwart America’s attempts to house poor people

It is one thing to receive a housing voucher and quite another to successfully use it

Section 8, season eight
|DENVER

“WHY THE fuck does this county even offer Section 8 if it’s a mythical unicorn that nobody ever gets?” asks Alex, the main character in Netflix’s new series “Maid”. The show, based on Stephanie Land’s book “Maid: Hard Work, Low Pay, and a Mother’s Will to Survive”, is a portrait of poverty and domestic work in Washington State. Section 8, now known as the Housing Choice Voucher Programme (HCVP), is a federal housing-assistance scheme that subsidises rent for 2.3m poor American households lucky enough to get their hands on a voucher. Others can spend years on waiting lists, hoping to be chosen.

Housing-policy wonks often refer to the voucher programme as a kind of lottery: win and your life may fundamentally change. When towering public-housing projects were demolished in the 1990s, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) used vouchers as a way to house America’s poor through the private market. With a voucher, tenants put 30% of their monthly income towards rent and the federal government covers the rest. Many people on voucher waiting lists are homeless or living with their families. Nearly half of all voucher-holders are black, 70% are racial minorities and about a third earn less than $10,000 a year.

This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline "To rent or not to rent"

What would America fight for?

From the December 11th 2021 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from United States

Joe Biden is practising some Clintonian politics

But he needs to do more than crack down on “junk fees” to woo swing voters

A surprising Japanese presence in a traditional American craft

Quilting connects continents


Seaport Tower shows New York’s fight between housing and heritage

Can the city build its future without destroying its past?