Finance & economics | Buttonwood

Is China “uninvestible”?

The word has become more common even as the world has become more investible

Few chinese companies have caught the imagination of global investors like its technology firms. But they have suffered a catastrophic spell. At one point in March, they had lost about 70% of their value since their 2021 peak. On March 14th Alex Yao of JPMorgan Chase and his team published a set of gloomy reports on internet firms such as Alibaba, an e-commerce giant, Dingdong, an online grocer, and Netease, a maker of computer games. Mr Yao fretted about the industry’s prospects over the next year, owing to China’s economic slowdown, its regulatory crackdown on tech and its souring relations with the West. Some of the reports even described the sector as “uninvestible”.

That word caused a bit of a furore. JPMorgan lost its position as the lead underwriter for the listing in Hong Kong of Kingsoft Cloud, a Chinese cloud-computing firm. According to Bloomberg on May 10th, editors at the bank had in fact tried to replace “uninvestible” with the less apocalyptic “unattractive”. But some mentions slipped past them.

This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline "Is China uninvestible?"

The coming food catastrophe

From the May 21st 2022 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Finance & economics

What campus protesters get wrong about divestment

Will withdrawing money hurt Israel?

Hedge funds make billions as India’s options market goes ballistic

The country’s retail investors are doing less well


Russia’s gas business will never recover from the war in Ukraine

Hopes of a Chinese rescue look increasingly vain